نمونه ترجمه تخصصی فقهی درباره بررسی روابط معنایی واژگان

Semantic relationships of words

Literary sciences are of the main topics in exegesis and all exegetes need them. Literary sciences cover philology, syntax, eloquence, and morphology each with their unique role in elaborating Quranic concepts. Among them, however, philology deserves more attention as finding the true meaning of statement depends on having a clear and accurate perception of the words that constitute that statement. Therefore, the majority of exegetes have emphasized strongly on understanding the meaning of words in the Holy Quran and have based their exegeses on this principle. They believe that with a good command on philology, a deeper exegesis of the text is achievable. The objective of the present study is to examine the semantic relationships of words based on concepts like synonymity, homonym, key words (واژگان دخیل), syntaxial aspect, and proofs of eloquence of the Holy Quran through comparing the ideas of two outstanding Sunni (Alusi) and Shia (Tabatabaie) exegetes. Through this, the author hopes to delve deeper into the divine words. To this end, a descriptive-analytical method was followed along with brining instances from the Holy Quran. After introducing the theoretical concepts about philology and eloquence, a few examples are given based on the two exegetes viewpoints for further examination. Using tables and diagrams, this paper tries to demonstrate the effect and role of literary sciences in the two exegeses and give a general and statistics-based viewpoint to the reader about the topic. The findings showed that the volume and quality of using literary sciences are not the same in the two works so that Roh Almaani relies more than Almizan on these sciences. Given that Almizan is more of a philosophical-social exegesis, the author uses these disciplines as a tool. In Rouh Almaani, on the other hand, these disciplines have an independent position. In other words, Tabatabaie deals with literary sciences as a second hand issue comparing with the main meaning in the Holy Quran and uses them only when he finds them beneficial for elaborating on the meaning of a verse. Alusi uses literary sciences to express his beliefs and reject those of other cults and Shia in particular. It is not easy, on the other hand, to find biased exegeses and interpretations in Tabatabaie’s work in favor Shias